CCDB BaseCar list updated

[ScotcH]

Ok ... finally got the BaseCar list updated. Note that this list will become final on March 23 ... until then, we're allowed to make changed, so if you spot something weird, please let me know!

http://www.macrocosm.on.ca/ccdb/BaseCarList.aspx

[G-ForceJunkie]

Apparently a 2001 Mustang Bullitt makes 420hp? I'm pretty sure it only makes 265 ;) (I think this is Ron Billings car that slipped in there)

Also, what happened to the 1988 (or 87?) Mustang 5.0 that weighed 3215lbs and made 225hp?

Why is the is the '03 Mustang GT susp rating at 55? and the '96 is at 50? What warrants that change? or is it a typo?

You're missing a 2007 from the year 'To' range on the 2005 Mustang...at least I assume it wouldn't have changed.

Other than that, I think the Mustang's are good :D

[thekid]

With exception to the Mazdaspeed 3, all the other Mazdaspeed cars are mispelt, the s in Mazdaspeed is missing.

[sjd]

Does the new SAE ratings affect anything since a lot of cars lost horsepower on paper. Do the new cars are rated under the new system have an advantage? For example (sticking with Mazdaspeed) the 2005 (Actually a 2006 since they didn't make a 2005) Mazdaspeed6 is listed at 274 horsepower while the 2007 makes 270 due to the changes in SAE ratings. Also it is listed as FWD when it should be AWD.

[Slowpoke]

With exception to the Mazdaspeed 3, all the other Mazdaspeed cars are mispelt, the s in Mazdaspeed is missing.

heh heh, heh heh, heh heh. He said "Mazda Peed". :p

[Slowpoke]

Well, that's just sweet, guys. Thanks to changes in the STi weights from year to year, you now have the '04 STi as the most PIP penalized STi of the model series. :rolleyes: Yet every Subie guy who's driven multiple years of stock STi's knows it was the worst handling of all of the USDM STi's so far.

http://ipastudio.com/forums/images/smilies/moonu.gif

[James Mewett]

Well, that's just sweet, guys. Thanks to changes in the STi weights from year to year, you now have the '04 STi as the most PIP penalized STi of the model series. :rolleyes: Yet every Subie guy who's driven multiple years of stock STi's knows it was the worst handling of all of the USDM STi's so far.

http://ipastudio.com/forums/images/smilies/moonu.gif

I presume what you are suggesting is that the '05 and later STis should have their SUSP rating increased from 80% to 85%?

[Slowpoke]

I presume what you are suggesting is that the '05 and later STis should have their SUSP rating increased from 80% to 85%?
The '04 never should have gone up 10% in the first place. I think this increase was largely based on the data you had on performance of Avi in his '05. Based on Avi's results last year, I think the 80% reflected well his prep level and skills.

[STIgma]

I presume what you are suggesting is that the '05 and later STis should have their SUSP rating increased from 80% to 85%?
Nice try James! ;)