Doug Phillips
03-29-2006, 02:09 PM
I have a question regarding how the PAX numbers were revised this year.
Some classes have had huge adjustments to the PAX from last year providing the class a time benifit of over .8 seconds over a 60 second course. The changes also appear to be in an opposite direction from the similiar classes in the SCCA.
What were the determining factors in the large PAX changes this year?
When my motor toasted last fall, if I had known that moving to ESP would give me a .5 second advantage over ESS with PAX alone, I might have put a couple of more $$ into a power buils instead of stock.
I am just trying to understand the process, not starting a crying session.
Some classes have had huge adjustments to the PAX from last year providing the class a time benifit of over .8 seconds over a 60 second course. The changes also appear to be in an opposite direction from the similiar classes in the SCCA.
What were the determining factors in the large PAX changes this year?
When my motor toasted last fall, if I had known that moving to ESP would give me a .5 second advantage over ESS with PAX alone, I might have put a couple of more $$ into a power buils instead of stock.
I am just trying to understand the process, not starting a crying session.